ICOscoring

@ICOscoring Нравится 0
Это ваш канал? Подтвердите владение для дополнительных возможностей

The official chanel of ICOscoring.com - analytical platform for assessing ICOs; The provided assessments take into account the main risks and uncertainties of the project, which allows you to increase the security of your investments in the ICO.
Гео и язык канала
не указан, Английский
Категория
Криптовалюты


Гео канала
не указан
Язык канала
Английский
Категория
Криптовалюты
Добавлен в индекс
18.05.2018 15:23
реклама
TGAlertsBot
Мониторинг упоминаний ключевых слов в каналах и чатах.
Telegram Analytics
Подписывайся, чтобы быть в курсе новостей TGStat.
SearcheeBot
Ваш гид в мире Telegram-каналов
120
подписчиков
~0
охват 1 публикации
~1
дневной охват
N/A
постов в день
N/A
ERR %
1.97
индекс цитирования
Репосты и упоминания канала
11 упоминаний канала
0 упоминаний публикаций
1 репостов
Crypto Lamer©
IT работа в стартапах
Crypto Head Hunter
Ulance
Crypto Jobs Market
Crypto Head Hunter
ALZA Official
Каналы, которые цитирует @ICOscoring
LINIX
Последние публикации
Удалённые
С упоминаниями
Репосты
ICOscoring 1 Jul 2019, 14:45
​​📊 ULTRA REVIEW on ICOScoring
--CLICK TO SEE THE REVIEW--
ULTRA – a tokenized game content distribution platform

🔎 Our opinion: During 2017-2018 gaming blockchain projects have been among the most popular ICOs - this industry was considered as one of the key for blockchain adoption. Unfortunately, tokens were generally useless, so the great majority of projects lost in value dramatically. Ultra does not differ much from those projects (decentralized/tokenized Steam alternatives) - so we see a chance for investors only in the short term hoping on the reputation of Bitfinex.

Risks:
• Partnerships are not so strong as it is claimed in promo materials
• Blockchain gaming projects traditionally have bad results and are unnoticed by the market
• Strong monopoly competitors with a significant influence
• Current results of the development cannot be proven
• Token functions do not have anything fundamentally unique, so it is likely to be useless for users
• Too large team that may cause significant cashburn

Detailed REVIEW:
ULTRA on ICOScoring
Date: 16 July (be ready ASAP)
Risk: Medium
Score: 3.2 / 5.0

Market ■■■□□
Product ■■■□□
Team ■■■■□
Model ■■□□□
Finance ■■■■□

#ultra @icoscoring
Читать полностью
ICOscoring 22 May 2019, 17:14
​​Check our reviews on upcoming IEOs !


🔹4.2▫️ Harmony
🔹4.2▫️ Sovrin
🔸3.2▫️ DeepCloud AI
🔸2.8▫️ STP

#icoscoring
Читать полностью
ICOscoring 21 May 2019, 12:15
​​📊 HARMONY REVIEW on ICOScoring
--CLICK TO SEE THE REVIEW--
Harmony – fast and secure blockchain with state sharding, PoS algorithm and decentralized randomness

🔎 Our opinion: we remember this project on our radar since the beginning of 2018 when it was raising funds on seed round. The terms for the current IEO round look highly beneficial for public investors, the team is strong and has already presented their testnet.

Risks:
• Tough competition with the similar PoS protocols
• Small allocations for public investors with low probability to win a ticket (by the way, it may be considered as an advantage of the campaign)

Detailed REVIEW:
Harmony on ICOScoring
Date: 28 May 2019
Risk: Low
Score: 4.2 / 5.0

Market ■■■■□
Product ■■■■□
Team ■■■■□
Model ■■■■□
Finance ■■■■■

#harmony @icoscoring
Читать полностью
ICOscoring 14 May 2019, 21:00
​​📊 STP REVIEW on ICOScoring
--CLICK TO SEE THE REVIEW--
STP – "Standard Tokenization Protocol", the protocol for asset tokenization

🔎 Our opinion: STP is a strange case where the project is directly connected to the GBIC fund. The fund invested in Ankr, Perlin, Aergo, Eximchain, Libra, Icon, Mainframe and many more. Now GBIC launches the network for assets tokenization and attract fund in public. We see it as a suspicious pivot from the fund.

Risks:
• No strong technical specialists in the team, only financial and management professionals
• Lack of technical specifications of the networks
• Digitilized compliance market seems to be narrow in the foreseeable future, and we expect such professional services (not tokenized) to remain quite firm
• Long and unclear roadmap

Detailed REVIEW:
STP on ICOScoring
Date: May 2019
Risk: High
Score: 2.8 / 5.0

Market ■■■■□
Product ■■□□□
Team ■■□□□
Model ■■■□□
Finance ■■■□□

#stp @icoscoring
Читать полностью
ICOscoring 7 May 2019, 21:58
​​📊 ORCHID REVIEW on ICOScoring
--CLICK TO SEE THE REVIEW--
Orchid Protocol – TOR-like network with the tokenized financial incentive

🔎 Our opinion: the idea is hard for the development but it may be considered as one of the strongest and far-reaching use cases for blockchain. The project is closed for investments, but the team promises to announce more updates soon.

Risks:
• non-public development and there is no way to track the progress
• too much funds attracted, so the cashburn is expected (also, gossips indicate even more funds contributed, up to 130 M USD)

Detailed REVIEW:
Orchid Protocol on ICOScoring
Risk: Low
Score: 4.2 / 5.0

Market ■■■■■
Product ■■■■□
Team ■■■■□
Model ■■■■□
Finance ■■■■□

#orchid @icoscoring
Читать полностью
ICOscoring 30 Apr 2019, 17:27
​​📊 THUNDER on ICOScoring
--CLICK TO SEE THE REVIEW--
Thunder – high-TPS blockchain

🔎 Our opinion: strong team with the proven track-record, but we see the current IEO terms unfair for investors - previous investors had too large discounts and allocations, so we expect strong downward pressure to the token

Risks:
• highly strong competition with other blockchain focused on TPS issue
• No rational grounds for the current round of fundraising (0.5 M USD raising now after the 50 M USD private round)
• High TPS are supported by centralization
• The website is written on WIX - that's unusual for a technology company with so many experienced tech specialists employed
• Too large team that may result in the significant cashburn

Detailed REVIEW:
Thunder on ICOScoring
Date: 9 May - Huobi
Risk: Medium
Score: 3.6 / 5.0

Market ■■□□□
Product ■■■■□
Team ■■■■■
Model ■■■■■
Finance ■■□□□

#thunder @icoscoring
Читать полностью
ICOscoring 24 Apr 2019, 21:00
​​📊 KEEP NETWORK REVIEW on ICOScoring
--CLICK TO SEE THE REVIEW--
Keep Network – off-chain protocol for private data storage

🔎 Our opinion: strong project with the mature tech background and the financial support from well-known funds (Andreessen Horovitz, Polychain, DHVC). But it is still little information about the development process and results.

Risks:
• Strong competitors (NuCypher, Enigma)
• Untransparent activity, so that it is hard to track the progress of the development
• Too much funds raising and the unpublic way of raising funds

Detailed REVIEW:
Keep Network on ICOScoring
Date: TBA
Risk: Medium
Score: 3.8 / 5.0

Market ■■■■□
Product ■■■■□
Team ■■■■□
Model ■■■■□
Finance ■■■□□

#keep @icoscoring
Читать полностью
ICOscoring 22 Apr 2019, 17:02
​​See our reviews on the following IEOs:

👉 Matic IEO
👉 Ocean Protocol IEO
👉 ARPA IEO

#icoscoring #matic #arpa #oceanprotocol
Читать полностью
ICOscoring 16 Apr 2019, 21:00
​​📊 MATIC REVIEW on ICOScoring
--CLICK TO SEE THE REVIEW--
Matic – scaling solution for the Ethereum and other blockchains using Plasma with PoS and side chains

🔎 Our opinion: Matic is the next project on Binance Launchpad. The solution is on trend of 2-layer scaling for blockchains, but we see some risks in financials and the team

Risks:
• High discounts to early investors - up to 70%
• High valuation for Binance Launchpad investors - 28M USD
• Low chances of participation (lottery type of tokensale for BNB holders)
• Competitors' teams are stronger and have more advanced expertise

Detailed REVIEW:
Matic on ICOScoring
Date: 24 April
Risk: Medium
Score: 3.8 / 5.0

Market ■■■■□
Product ■■■■□
Team ■■■□□
Model ■■■■□
Finance ■■■■□

#matic #ieo #binance @icoscoring
Читать полностью
ICOscoring 8 Apr 2019, 18:01
​​📊 JPM REVIEW on ICOScoring
--CLICK TO SEE THE REVIEW--
JPM – stablecoin from J.P. Morgan

🔎 Our opinion: this new pivot of J.P. Morgan, one the largest investment banks, is a good strategic decision in private solutions for the tradition financial institutions. It would be exciting to see the competition with Ripple.

Detailed REVIEW:
JPM on ICOScoring
Score: 4.4 / 5.0

Market ■■■■■
Product ■■■■□
Team ■■■■□
Model ■■■■□
Finance ■■■■■

#jpm #jpmorgan @icoscoring
Читать полностью
ICOscoring 30 Mar 2019, 18:25
​​📊 SAGA REVIEW on ICOScoring
--CLICK TO SEE THE REVIEW--
Saga – stablecoin backed by fiat reserves.

🔎 Our opinion: strong team with the focus on the monetary research, but the tech stack behind does not deserve 30M USD raised and does not align with the trends on the market

Risks:
• The project does not align with the trends in the stablecoin field
• Algorithms are focused on fiat collateral management - the idea widely hated in the crypto community as it is destined to be tied to the human factor
• Too much funds attracted for such a weak technology stack. The budget seems to be skewed to salaries, so the project may be considered as a cash-burn machine
• Strong focus on the monetary research, but not the development

Detailed REVIEW:
Saga on ICOScoring
Date: No ICO scheduled
Risk: Medium
Score: 3.6 / 5.0

Market ■■■□□
Product ■■■■□
Team ■■■■□
Model ■■■□□
Finance ■■■■□

#saga @icoscoring
Читать полностью
ICOscoring 14 Mar 2019, 21:42
​​📊 AMPLEFORTH REVIEW on ICOScoring
--CLICK TO SEE THE REVIEW--
Ampleforth - stable coin based on the managing token supply on users' accounts

🔎 Our opinion: the solution is both beautiful and risky

Risks:
• Tough competition and strong project with stable coin already on the market
• The system has a right to manage users' accounts, withdraw and add tokens - that may distract some users
• The volatility and uncertainty are not removed - volatility is just replaced from the Prices to Volumes, and Inflation risk turns just Shrinkinflation risk

Detailed REVIEW:
Ampleforth on ICOScoring
Date: TBA
Risk: Low
Score: 4.0 / 5.0

Market ■■■■■
Product ■■■■□
Team ■■■■□
Model ■■■■□
Finance ■■■□□

#ampleforth @icoscoring
Читать полностью
ICOscoring 12 Mar 2019, 11:38
​​📊 CERTIK REVIEW on ICOScoring
--CLICK TO SEE THE REVIEW--
CertiK – a platform for the formal verification of smart-contracts and blockchain ecosystems. According to rumors, it is the next project on the Binance Launchpad right after Celer.

🔎 Our opinion: the product may appear as a leader in the field of the smart-contracts and protocols audit, but we see no strong token value

Risks:
• No financial metrics announced
• Uncertain utility of decentralized solutions and their scalability in the field of audit
• Token is likely to be useless in the network

Detailed REVIEW:
CertiK on ICOScoring
Date: TBA
Risk: Medium
Score: 3.6 / 5.0

Market ■■■■□
Product ■■■■□
Team ■■■■□
Model ■■■□□
Finance ■■■□□

#certik @icoscoring
Читать полностью
ICOscoring 1 Feb 2019, 20:11
​​📊 RESERVE REVIEW on ICOScoring
--CLICK TO SEE THE REVIEW--
Reserve – stable coin backed to USD with the collateral portfolio

🔎 Our opinion: the project has a strong team and distinguished investors on board.

Risks:
• High valuation
• Strong competitors
• Portfolio management issues with little automation

Detailed REVIEW:
Reserve on ICOScoring
Date: TBA
Risk: Medium
Score: 3.6 / 5.0

Market ■■■□□
Product ■■■■□
Team ■■■■□
Model ■■■□□
Finance ■■■■□

#reserve @icoscoring
Читать полностью
ICOscoring 25 Jan 2019, 21:20
​​The most discussed projects and our detailed reviews. Click to check!


🔹4.2▫️ Urbit
🔹4.2▫️ BitTorrent
🔹4.0▫️ Handshake
🔹4.0▫️ Elrond
🔸3.8▫️ Zeppelin OS
🔸3.8▫️ NYM
🔸3.6▫️ XAIN
🔸3.6▫️ Nervos
🔸3.4▫️ Near Protocol
🔸3.2▫️ Ferrum
🔸3.2▫️ DeepCloud AI

#icoscoring
Читать полностью
ICOscoring 24 Jan 2019, 19:23
​​📊 NYM REVIEW on ICOScoring
--CLICK TO SEE THE REVIEW--
NYM – authentication service with the focus on privacy

🔎 Our opinion: one of the most promising projects from the Binance acceleration program. The potential market is narrow, but some scalability plans are attractive. The project is likely to achieve the higher rank, when more information become availabe.

Strengths
• Strong team with the relevant and proven track record
• The potential of implementing the wider range of use cases

Risks:
• The narrow market of authentication services
• Strong competition on both centralized and decentralized landscapes
• Financial and technical details are not available yet

Detailed REVIEW:
NYM on ICOScoring
Date: TBA
Risk: Medium
Score: 3.8 / 5.0

Market ■■■■□
Product ■■■□□
Model ■■■■■
Finance ■■■□□
Team ■■■■□

#nym @icoscoring
Читать полностью
ICOscoring 17 Jan 2019, 15:00
​​📊 TANGRAM REVIEW on ICOScoring
--CLICK TO SEE THE REVIEW--
Tangram – Open-source transaction blockchain platform, which plans to make free, fast and secure digital payments. Potentially private distributed ledger network.

Risks:
• Tough competition
• Lack of technical details
• Lack of token utility description

Detailed REVIEW:
Tangram on ICOScoring
Date: TBA
Risk: High
Score: 2.6 / 5.0

Market ■■■□□
Product ■■□□□
Team ■■■□□
Model ■■□□□
Finance ■■■□□

#Tangram @icoscoring
Читать полностью
ICOscoring 16 Jan 2019, 17:51
​​📊 BITTORRENT REVIEW on ICOScoring
--CLICK TO SEE THE REVIEW--
BitTorrent – P2P file sharing on TRON. The most upcoming discussed tokensale.

🔎 Our opinion: the idea of implementing economic incentives in torrent protocols is wise and has rational grounds. The project achieved high score in our methodology, but beware of significant risks! The story behind BitTorent affilation with TRON, complicated technical issues and weak ground of the tokensale are significant redflags to consider the project too risky for investments

Risks:
• No rational grounds for the upcoming tokensale
• Technical difficulty and criticism from former team members
• Lack of technical details
• No financial information announced
• Strong compliance risk - cryptocurrencies and torrent-piracy combined

Detailed REVIEW:
BitTorrent on ICOScoring
Date: TBA
Risk: Low
Score: 4.0 / 5.0

Market ■■■■■
Product ■■■□□
Team ■■■■■
Model ■■■■■
Finance ■■□□□

#bittorrent @icoscoring
Читать полностью
ICOscoring 6 Jan 2019, 15:36
​​FETCH UPDATA

Fetch.ai announced a token sale on the Binance Platform

We analysed the project in June 2018 and found it strong among the competitors.
By the way, the valuation was too high for a greenfield project (around $200M).

Hope to receive new data and expect significant changes to consider participation on the token sale.

#fetch #icoscoring
Читать полностью
ICOscoring 24 Dec 2018, 15:21
​​📊 NEW ARTICLE 📊

ICOScoring has already covered the topic of Hype, and our new article describes the more detailed application of this concept in the investment decision making

See in the article:
• How does hype influence on the timing of investments
• Traditional models of hype analysis
• How the downtrend on the blockchain market may be described in terms of traditional models of Hype

👉 TIMING IN LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS: HYPE ANALYSIS MATTERS

🔹 Waiting for your comments and thoughts.

#article #icoscoring #medium
Читать полностью